If you were to look at the possession limits and catch limits of walleye in the central district of Montana you might notice a trend. High daily limits with doubled possession limits. Is this necessary? For ages it has been believed that walleye will single handedly wipe out a population of trout. That’s simply not true. Let’s take a look at the Missouri River below Holter Dam. Known to many of out of state fly fishing clients as blue ribbon trout fishing. Before 2011 the limit on walleye was the standard state limit of 5 daily. Then FWP commission voted to change it to unlimited harvest in that section of river. This was done to appease the trout outfitters because they were concerned the walleye would be detrimental to the population of non native trout they make their money fishing for. However something most folks don’t realize is that our fwp biologist conducted a multi year study below holter to see how, if at all the “predator” fish would affect the river. Titled, “An evaluation of walleye in the missouri river between holter dam and great falls”. The 38 page report talks about creel surveys, angling pressure, tracked walleye (radio and tags), disease, water flow, drought, etc. In the conclusion of the study it clearly explains that things like drought from 99’-07’, whirling disease from 94’-2010’ on 53% of the spawning beds used by trout, walleye population increasing 2.3-14times since pre 1996, and lastly a angler use day number raising by nearly 50,000 in just the years from 95’-01’. Despite all of those factors the trout numbers below holter dam are still amazing and it still continues to be a blue ribbon trout fishery. So why are we continuing to try to suppress the walleye population? In the proposed regs for 2020 fwp would like to implement a 20 walleye limit below holter dam. This might seem like a step in the right direction to most. Is it really? Seems to me that 20 walleye a day is a rather high number of fish to be able to keep. FWP has put this limit in place at canyon ferry to lower the number of walleye in the lake. My question is, if the walleye below holter aren’t hurting the trout population then why do we need such liberal limits on them?? In my opinion all sections of the Missouri River should have a more strict limit on the walleye. Express your opinion to fwp and let them know that they should follow their own studies based on science when making the decisions below holter dam.
Troy Warburton
Toston, Montana
FWP News: Partial closure at Swinging Bridge Fishing Access Site beginning April 22
By angelamontana
Exclusive Sneak Peek: MT Outdoor Podcast meets with the Wizard of the Waterways
Fresno and Nelson Reservoirs Fishing Report by Brian Olson 4.18.24
Brett French reports: Yellowstone River stays closed to waterfowl hunting
See you Saturday for the 14th Annual MTSFW Pig Roast Fundraiser
GRIZZLY TITS!!! by Montana Grant
Holy Quack! Drake Mallard Sets New Flight Speed Record for Wildlife Research Lab
UM Launches Campaign to Build Environment and Conservation Hub
By Moosetrack Megan
Reminder to turn in Kootenai River creel packets by May 1 for a chance to win prizes!
Adenovirus Hemorrhagic Disease suspected as culprit in Upper Snake moose mortalities
Grizzly bear euthanized due to cattle depredation in Washakie County
Wyoming ElkFest 2024 Bidder Registration Now Open
It only takes a second…
TREE TIME!!! by Montana Grant
Opening Day Spring Turkey
Watch for elephants…in Butte
Castaways Rescued in Pacific Ocean after Spelling “HELP” with Palm Leaves
Upper Salmon River Steelhead Fishing Report 4.16.24
FWP News: Hunting permit drawing results now available
A DIY Turkey Decoy that won’t break the bank
CORNERED!!! by Montana Grant
Tourons of National Parks Clip: Dose of Dumb
2024 Spring Mack Days – Week 5 Results
Record Low Snowpack Results in Abnormally Dry to Severe Drought Conditions This Spring
Riley's Meats - Butte Wild Game Processing